DC sniper Lee Boyd Malvo’s life sentence thrown out:
Here we go again with another bleeding heart judge.
A federal district court judge has overturned the sentence of Lee Boyd Malvo, one of the two people convicted in D.C.-area Beltway sniper attacks nearly 15 years ago, according to a ruling released Friday.
The dishonorable judge felt that Malvo’s sentenced to life in prison without parole for the sniper-style attacks that killed 10 people over a 3 week period was too severe because he was 17 years old at the time.
Possibly if the teenage thug/killer/sniper/murderer/assassin would have killed 11 or 12 that would have made a difference. This thug/killer/sniper/murderer/assassin knew exactly what he was doing at 17 years of age.
Hypothetically; if Malvo was 17 on June 5th when he committed the crimes with his wack job partner John Allen Muhammad and supposedly was not responsible for his actions but turned 18 the next day on June 6th, he would have known better, RIGHT?? Give me a %#(&*@ break.
Muhammad was a very sick puppy and Malvo idolized him.
His ambulance chaser figured out a way he could swindle a few extra $oldi by stirring up this thug/killer/sniper/murderer/assassin case again. That is absolutely what it amounts to.
Why would anyone want to see a thug/killer/sniper/murderer/assassin back on the streets after what he and his thug/killer/sniper/murderer/assassin partner did.
If you remember; they rigged up a car without a backseat so the could lay down in a sniper position; drilled a hole in the trunk lid area, stick a rifle out of the hole and drove around randomly kill innocent people. The thing about these two bastards, they were not prejudice, they killed anyone and everyone. Although, it was later determined Muhammad hated white people. Brilliant but deadly idea for two guys that supposedly didn’t know what they were doing. It was almost impossible to detect where the sniper was set up.
BUT, always the BUT; the dishonorable court’s now think that the poor 17 year old thug/killer/sniper/murderer/assassin was too young to be responsible. Give me another %#&*_@ break.
The state got one thing right. In 2009 they executed Muhammad for his participation in the crimes. What they did wrong; they didn’t have Malvo sitting in his lap when they flipped the switch.
Should there be a cut off age when a kid does not fully understand right from wrong? I would say yes. That age should be 9 or 10 years old.
In total the two thug/killer/sniper/murderer/assassins 10 killed, 3 injured (D.C. metropolitan area); 17 victims elsewhere. That does not sound like child play to me.
What all of these off the wall decision lately, we should have the judges serve the remaining time on the sentences.
I still am a very big advocate of having blanket sentences set up by the federal government. A crime committed by an Eskimo has the same penalty as the same crime committed by a pineapple picker in Hawaii. No exceptions. They should be mandatory; that would take away the favoritism and poor decisions some of these nut job judges make.
Life can be as simple as one wants it to be. But, the Big But. There are a particular breed of critter in this country, probably around the world, that are of the opinion; the harder/difficult they make their job appear, the more important they think they look to others and it is a gigantic ego boost for them. I call them excess baggage; like something that gets lost and we never miss it.